August 2008 Visa Bulletin - Good News for EB2 India

Bloged in California Immigration Lawyer by Peerally Friday July 11, 2008

Visa Bulletin for August 2008 came out today, there was jump in the EB2 category for Indian Born individuals to June 2006 and EB1 for Indian Born is still current. If your labor certification has a priority date of June 2006 or below or qualify under an EB1 category, please call our office at (510)742.5887 or email info@peerallylaw.com
Read more…

Porting I485 under AC21

Bloged in California Immigration Lawyer by Peerally Saturday July 5, 2008

Adjustment of status portability is a creation of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21) Pub. L No. 106-313, 114 Stat. 1251 (October 17, 2000), which amended Section 204(j) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This law allows employees to accept a job that is in the same or similar occupational classification as the job on which the I-140 petition was based, if an adjustment of status application (I-485) has been pending for 180 days or more. The underlying I-140 petition remains valid, even though the applicant has changed jobs.

The determination that the new job is in the same or similar occupational classification is made by

    Comparing the job duties in the original ETA 750 or 9089 or I-140 with the job duties of the new job;
    Comparing the DOT or SOC codes of the I-140 with those of the new position;
    Comparing the previous and new wage to see if there is a substantial discrepancy.

Jobs with very different responsibilities may still fall under the same occupational classification because the substantive knowledge required for those jobs can be identical.  If the originally intended employer withdraws the previously approved I-140 on or after the I-485 has been pending for 180 days, the I-140 remains valid. If the applicant has not already submitted evidence of the new qualifying offer of employment, the USCIS officer should issue a notice of intent to deny.

An applicant can “port” before the 180 days have passed because there is no requirement that the applicant ever have been employed by the original petitioner while the I-485 was pending. The only requirement is that there was an intent to accept that employment at the time that the adjustment of status application was filed.

7 Mistakes IT Companies Make in Employment Immigration Cases

Bloged in California Immigration Lawyer by Peerally Saturday July 5, 2008

 

With our experience dealing with the immigration issues for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (UCIS), Department of Labor (DOL) and other immigration entities, we have noticed few common mistakes that most small IT companies make. Such mistakes result in lengthy Request for Further Evidence (RFE) or even denials. As such we have tried to compile in this short release the most common mistakes. Note that the list is non exhaustive but it only includes the common mistakes that our own office have noticed after the filing of more than 300 cases. We are sure that there are many other mistakes that can easily be corrected. This list is also limited to issues pertaining H1Bs new cases and transfers. We will compile another list for Labor Certifications and I-140 soon.

Read full article here

23 Queries
0.401 Seconds
Web Development by IAG