<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Donald Neufeld’s 2010 USCIS Memo for H-1B Petitions be a Harmless Paper Tiger?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://immigrationlegalblog.com/archives/627/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://immigrationlegalblog.com/archives/627</link>
	<description>US Immigration Law Blog By Shah Peerally Law Group PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: study Smarter</title>
		<link>http://immigrationlegalblog.com/archives/627/comment-page-1#comment-3947</link>
		<dc:creator>study Smarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immigrationlegalblog.com/?p=627#comment-3947</guid>
		<description>Comfortably, the article is in reality the greatest on this worthw hile theme. I agree with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your forthcoming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the fantastic lucidity in your documentation. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. De lightful work and a lot of success in your business enterprize!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comfortably, the article is in reality the greatest on this worthw hile theme. I agree with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your forthcoming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the fantastic lucidity in your documentation. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. De lightful work and a lot of success in your business enterprize!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://immigrationlegalblog.com/archives/627/comment-page-1#comment-3871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immigrationlegalblog.com/?p=627#comment-3871</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing this, I thought it was really helpful, and it clarified a lot of the concerns I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing this, I thought it was really helpful, and it clarified a lot of the concerns I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://immigrationlegalblog.com/archives/627/comment-page-1#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immigrationlegalblog.com/?p=627#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court successfuly upheld the 2nd admendment.  The only thing concerning about this case was that it ended up with a 5-4 majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court successfuly upheld the 2nd admendment.  The only thing concerning about this case was that it ended up with a 5-4 majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
